Viewers love different kinds of content, with video being one of  the more popular varieties. But does it matter where you go to share that  content? This week, Bit.ly decided to talk about link half-life–how long links  shared through their service tend to last based on their origination point. In  this context, a Bit.ly link’s half life is essentially equal to the time it  takes that link to reach half the clicks it will accrue throughout its life.  What did they find? YouTube links have a longer half-life than those for Twitter or  Facebook. 
The average half-life for links shared on YouTube is a whopping 7.4 hours. To  put that into a bit of perspective, the average Bit.ly link (regardless of  source) has a half-life of around 3 hours. That means that the public interest  level in the links shared on YouTube tends to last twice as long as interest in  links shared on Facebook or Twitter.
That’s just huge. But what does it mean in terms of actionable advice? Easy: share your links on YouTube, in the video description as well as in  annotations on the video itself.
It’s not any kind of indictment of the practice of sharing links on Facebook  and Twitter. Those links still get plenty of clicks–this data isn’t even about  total clicks… but rather when in the link’s life-cycle the clicks reach their  peak. You could even conclude that this information means you should share  individual links more than once on social platforms outside of YouTube.
It makes perfect sense, really. On Twitter, you share a link, and it pretty  quickly makes its way down the page, as other people the consumer is following  also Tweet. Same with sharing on the Facebook wall. Whereas with YouTube, the  video–and the links–are just right there… always. No new content appears on the  page over time to push it down below the fold.
So maybe some of your readers don’t even see your links the first time you  publish them on Twitter or Facebook? Maybe publishing the same link again at a  future point in time might expose it to even more people? Of course, the loyal  followers who do see and read what you post probably won’t want to deal with  tons of duplicate posts, so you wouldn’t want to overdo it.
Again, this is general data. But clearly this analysis from Bit.ly just adds  more evidence to the already-mountain-sized pile of evidence that all brands and  small businesses should be exploring and experimenting with online video. You  can’t post links on YouTube, where they hold more interest, if you don’t even  have any videos or a YouTube channel.
by Jeremy Scott
tags; "search engine marketing San Jose CA, getfound San Jose CA, search marketing San  Jose CA, search engine optimization San Jose CA, internet marketing San Jose CA,  video seo, social marketing, video seo bay area"

No comments:
Post a Comment